Review: Gibson’s Finest Sterling Canadian Whisky

Gibson's Sterling Gibson’s Sterling was first crafted at a time when Gibson’s whiskies were in high demand – the 12 year old version had much more demand than supply, so Gibson’s wanted to produce something to provide customers with the product they desired without having to wait a full 12 years for new whisky to be produced. Gibson’s sterling was the result, blended from some younger whiskies than in the 12 year old versions (and some considerably older ones too) and its popularity resulted in the continuing production of this whisky.

Nose: fruity rye! I always get a breeze of white/green gooseberries as I pour this one. The nose comes off a bit buttery and creamy with some dry rye bitterness as well which doesn’t do it any favours. There is some light vanilla in the background, along with some light oakiness, maple, and light brown sugar. There’s also a fair bit of graininess to it – there are smells reminiscent of some of the grainy vodkas. As I spend some more time with the nose the bitterness fades slightly and is replaced by a bit of sweetness and molasses. Not a great one, but ok – the bitterness is a bit too much and is out of place. 23/30 (77%)

Taste: it’s light, smooth and reasonably sweet with some rye, maple, and clove amid a lemon-like citrusy backdrop along with some very gentle oak. The mouthfeel is quite nice on this one and it feels juicy with the citrus and berry notes. There is a touch of bitterness in line with the nose but it isn’t as bad on the palate as the nose. Some spices come out on the end – clove and cinnamon – but the cinnamon doesn’t quite carry the spiciness of fresh cinnamon but has more the influence of cinnamon in pumpkin bread or the like. I get a lot of rum notes and am reminded a lot of Bacardi 8 year old as I sip this one. However, it is fairly easy-going and lacks complexity. It’s also reasonably dry, which doesn’t surprise me after the nose. 23.5/30 (78%)

Finish: The spices start off the finish before some molasses and woodiness, which is slightly sweet and is pleasant. There’s some fruity rye which carries on for a decent bit afterward. It has medium length, but I was pleasantly surprised by it. 17.5/20 (88%)

ConclusiGibson's Sterling (2)on: Reasonably pleasant, although the bitterness and nose could be improved and the taste is a little too laid-back. A decent value whisky, and, apart from a few off-key bits, it is quite pleasant. 15.5/20 (78%)

Overall: 79.5/100


4 thoughts on “Review: Gibson’s Finest Sterling Canadian Whisky

  1. Pingback: My Top 10 Budget Canadian Whiskies (Sept. 2014) | Whisky Won

  2. Pingback: My Top 15 “Mid-Range” Canadian Whiskies (Sept. 2014) | Whisky Won

  3. Oh, come on. I was looking for an evaluation to lead me to choose which was better – Schenley OFC or Gibson’s Finest Sterling… and you gave them both 79.5, exactly.
    I bought two bottles of both last evening at the Duty Free store in Sarnia, Ontario, (CAN$10.99 and CAN$11.99, respectively) on my way home to the States. I am now tasting each… … … I am leaning toward Gibson’s Sterling.
    Even your description of Gibson’s is more verbose, maybe implying a bit more flavor and nuance?? Yes, after another sip… the Gibson’s has a lot more… variety in palette? Sorry, I don’t have the connoisseur vocabulary… I like Gibson’s better.

    • Gibson’s would have won out if there weren’t a few off bitter notes; which one I prefer is usually a matter of mood. Rating, in itself, is hard business…even depending on how I divide up my divisions of nose/taste/finish/conclusion a little can separate these two.

      Surprisingly, people’s palates and preferences vary quite a bit in whisky. In broad strokes, generally not, but some of my absolute favorite whiskies are ones which some of my friends can’t tolerate at all. As I make purchasing decisions, I generally go to a number of different places to get different opinions, and these quite often vary even among the experts. I wrote more on this here, if you are interested:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s